Which method is commonly used in program evaluation to gather stakeholder perspectives?

Which method is commonly used in program evaluation to gather stakeholder perspectives?

• A. Financial audits
• B. Document-only review
• C. Surveys, interviews, observations, and data analysis
• D. Literature review

Answer: (C)

Gathering stakeholder perspectives in program evaluation is best done with a mixed-method approach that actively engages the people affected by or involved in the program. Surveys reach a broad group, providing measurable input on satisfaction, outcomes, and opinions. Interviews dive deeper, offering detailed stories, motivations, and context behind those opinions. Observations reveal how the program works in practice, capturing behaviors and interactions that participants may not articulate. Analyzing relevant data sources—such as performance metrics, records, or outcomes—adds objective context to interpret the views gathered. Together, these methods allow triangulation, giving a more complete and credible understanding of stakeholder experiences and needs. Financial audits focus on finances and compliance rather than stakeholder insights. A document-only review depends on existing materials and misses direct input from stakeholders. A literature review looks at published research rather than gathering fresh perspectives from those involved in the program.

Gathering stakeholder perspectives in program evaluation is best done with a mixed-method approach that actively engages the people affected by or involved in the program. Surveys reach a broad group, providing measurable input on satisfaction, outcomes, and opinions. Interviews dive deeper, offering detailed stories, motivations, and context behind those opinions. Observations reveal how the program works in practice, capturing behaviors and interactions that participants may not articulate. Analyzing relevant data sources—such as performance metrics, records, or outcomes—adds objective context to interpret the views gathered. Together, these methods allow triangulation, giving a more complete and credible understanding of stakeholder experiences and needs.

Financial audits focus on finances and compliance rather than stakeholder insights. A document-only review depends on existing materials and misses direct input from stakeholders. A literature review looks at published research rather than gathering fresh perspectives from those involved in the program.